[UPHPU] cakephp questions

[William Attwood]

I prefer kohana due to the light footprint. It is also developed for  
php 5.  However cake has a much larger community and more addon modules.

It's a toss up. I like to do a lot of my own system arch. which makes  
kohana win my vote

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 15, 2009, at 11:08 PM, Brandon Stout <bms at mscis.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> First a couple questions now that we had a meeting about cakephp.   
> When
> I looked at it a few months ago, I was surprised to see that they were
> still writing their product for PHP 4, and the documentation stated  
> they
> did not plan to support PHP 5 since 'most people are still using PHP  
> 4'
> (loosely quoted).  Since PHP 5 has been out a few years, I thought  
> that
> was pretty lame, and went with Kohana ( http://kohanaphp.com ).  Since
> then, Mac Newbold mentioned to me that cakephp had a beta product that
> does support PHP 5.  Now my questions:
>
> * If it supports both PHP 4 and 5, does it take advantage sufficiently
> of PHP 5 OOP?
> * Is there a lot of bloat since you have to sometimes do the same  
> thing
> two different ways: the PHP 4 way and the PHP 5 way?  It seems that an
> application should support one or the other, not both at the same time
> for that reason.
> * Are there any Kohana PHP users out there that prefer one over the
> other, and if so, what?
>
> Brandon Stout
> Stout Hosting LLC
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAklwJEUACgkQx0pgn74qrcKbIACgnm2NtoKE0EZQJNR48aAYQnSU
> FFMAn2hsP5gcg5I/TKotUustE+zkdPS7
> =AHLa
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> UPHPU mailing list
> UPHPU at uphpu.org
> http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
> IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net