[UPHPU] Was "AJAX frameworks" - Now Frameworks in general...
Jason Jones
poeticintensity at gmail.com
Wed Mar 11 10:47:46 MDT 2009
I'm gonna step out on this one because this topic has been a hot one in my
head for quite some time now. Not only with AJAX, but frameworks in
general.
When I began programming, there were no frameworks for PHP, JavaScript, or
AJAX (not sure if AJAX even existed back then). I programmed from scratch
by hand, and have done so ever since. Anyway, this thread made me think
that this could be quite a good discussion, and bring some light to the
debate to use a framework or not. Here is my experience:
- I've created my own templating system which works just fine, and
enables me to create applications very quickly - it's not robust at all when
compared to the likes of codeigniter or cakePHP, but for my purposes, it
works wonderfully, scales well, and can be used in highly complex apps.
- I worked on a project with a guy who was a framework junkie. He
implemented multiple JS libraries (moo-tools, dojo, and most likely a few
others) and I'm sure he used a PHP framework to code, and although his
application was developed extremely quick, when actually loaded in the
browser, it ran as fast as mud flowing uphill. Seriously, it had so much
eye-candy, it took forever to actually do anything with his app. I was not
impressed.
- Although I haven't done any work personally with any framework, I've
read quite a bit about them, and consider myself at least a bit informed
about them.
Now here are some questions I have:
1. I know that frameworks simultaneously make coding faster, yet make
executing code slower. I know this depends *highly* upon implementation and
skill of the programmer, yet I can't get it out of my head that while
implementing a canned framework, I'm importing thousands of lines of
executable code which I'll never use. Should I be worried about that? Are
the benefits of using a framework worth it?
2. At the first programming job I ever had, I decided to code by hand (it
was only HTML and a little JS), while my two colleagues decided to go the
WYSIWYG route. While they were marginally faster than me at whipping out
websites, I found that when their sites had bugs, they had no idea how to
fix them, and would come to me. Because I had been coding by hand, and thus
being able to figure out the bugs, I could squash their bugs much quicker
than they could. Will frameworks create the same dependance upon a
higher-level coding, thus disabling me from learning more about the core
language? (Kind of a stupid question, I know, but broadened - I believe
might still be relevant to users who have never coded PHP outside of a
framework)
3. As I understand it, to some level, frameworks standardize the codebase
and make it easier for more developers to jump on board without having to
learn the nuances of an eclectic developer. I'm worried that, should I
decide to use a framework for a project, and find its capabilities lacking,
or am unable to make the framework function for a part of the project, I
would go around it, thus fudging the code somehow, and making more of a mess
than had I not used the framework to begin with. Do frameworks provide all
the funcionality needed to self-contain the code? Are they programatically
restrictive?
I guess that's it for now. Hopefully this will spur some constructive
debate and enlighten people like me who can definitely see the advantages to
using a PHP framework, or a JS library, but can also see the negative side
as well.
--Jason
More information about the UPHPU
mailing list